Reasoned Response to the Article: $120,000 - The Penalty for Good Looks in the Adelaide Advertiser. The westbound Australian Full Courts decision to award a lessen compensation to Widow, Mrs Teresa de gross revenue, because of good looks is completely legal. But is it near? This practice of fairness was passed in 1863, when women did not eat a great deal in the counselling of an independent income, when they were dependent on their husbands for aliment and shelter. This practice of law utter that as beautiful widows had a high likelihood of acquiring remarried and thereby see a more stable monetary status than plain women, they did not conduct a full(a) compensation. Back then this was a useful law - load-bearing(a) those women who were not as likely to re marry - entirely now, creation more independent than in the past, they can film whether to marry or not. A beautiful cleaning woman may not want to go bad married again, but because of this law, they would gestate to conk with less compensation than a plain woman who may or may not want to get remarried. This law, which traveled into the Australian legal system from Eng take down, has been repealed from the English legitimate dodging since 1971. Australia should repeal the law too.
In a land where everyone is verbalize to be equal, there should not be a law discriminating between one womans face and anothers. Mrs de Sales verbalize ...It shouldnt matter if I had four arms and purpleness muscae volitantes; a someone should still get 100 per penny of their payout. What Mrs de Sales meant was that every women, plain and beautiful, are equal and they shou! ld all, therefore, be compensated the same. To more accurately state her point, Mrs de Sales should have said: ...It shouldnt matter if I was the most beautiful soul in... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper