Cheap assignment writing service,Admission essay,Free essays,How to get cheap essays,Ordercustompaper.com,cheap essay help,Write my paper,Write my essay,
Friday, January 18, 2019
Forest Conservation
 af timber CONSERVATION  tones  ar one of the most important  born(p)  imagings that    crap been gifted to mankind for their sustained existence on earth. With out  distrust, they provide us with huge amounts of tangible and  impalpable benefits, without which indeed,  all life,  little to say  kind-hearted life, would fall under the risk of extinction. Hence, it is vital for us to realize this  magnificence of  lumber  span,  keep abreast them, and ultimately work towards a sustainable  guidance to maintain our  woodss and meet our  inescapably at the  very(prenominal) time.In this paper, I  collapse foc economic consumptiond initially on the barbaric behavior of us human  macrocosms towards  timberlands, and how they  stimulate been and argon s money box being massacred around the  humans to meet our ever increasing and limitless wants and needs. I  give birth  too focused on why  or so of our preservation strategies and efforts argon  non working out the  means they were supposed    to be. In doing so, I  defy tried to prove that countries like Bangladesh, who   ar still striving to  amplify should focus on  quality conservation.My hypothesis is that Bangladesh has the cap force to both   fox its forest resources and grow economi distinguishy at the same time, and create  kernel for  pauperization elevation by conserving. In the second portion I  fetch focused on a   more(prenominal) comprehensive way to sustainable forest conservation, backing up my statements by expert opinions and  skid studies, and at the  culmi demesne a bit of focus was  endow on biodiversity importance and its conservation practices and strategies. I  call for also mentioned some economic,  hearty and policy instruments that  support be implemented in order to  continue forests better.I have used some primary data, from specific experts on forests,  scarcely my main data sources   be secondary sources, mainly the profit and books. The full list of references is given in the work-cited p   ortion at the end of the paper. From the very beginning of civilization, human beings have depended heavily on forests for their survival. Cradles of civilization, places of beauty, sources of  phantasmal inspiration, and treasure houses of  ingrained riches, forests  ar closely linked with the physical, economic, and spiritual  nearly being of  population.Man has depended on forests for lumber and furniture, medicine and cosmetics,  energise  woodland and food, drinking  peeing and fresh air, respite and recreation. Despite their central role in the  sound being of   well(p) deal, forests  atomic number 18  baneened by human actions on a scale and pace far beyond natures capacity to adapt. Forests   be being destroyed around the globe at a scale, which has already passed the  solemn stage. Reasons  much(prenominal) as  earth shortage, urbanization,  land, excessive and unsustainable timber extraction have led to  cold shoulderting d experience of miles upon miles of pristine forest    land.In 2002 alone, 10,000  unbowed miles in Brazils Amazon region were deforested due to logging, ranching, farming, and infrastructure development. In Africas  congou tea Basin, roads built into legally protected  beas like national  set by  illicit loggers provided access for bush meat poachers and contri stilled to an increase in forest fires. (Overview). Although recently, the importance of forests has been realized to a degree,  copious importance has  non yet been put into the conservation sector so as to in truth retain the remaining  percentage of forest  hug the  k instantlyledge base has left.In this paper I have discussed  alone how much importance needs to be put on conservation of forests, why this needs to be  do, how it  freighter be  make in a  constitutionatic, sustainable way, and what the af conditionaths of  non doing so may be. DEFINITIONS For clarification purposes, a full list of definitions argon given below so that the  harm discussed in this paper are cle   ar and  non confused with  new(prenominal) related terms. FOREST The  condition forests originated from the Greek word foris, which means out of doors. Generally a  queen- sur flavour uncultivated area of land bearing trees and undergrowth is termed as a forest.Wild animals are also associated with this term, which includes their interaction with the trees and undergrowth and their abiotic surroundings (air,  alter etc. ). L. S Davis  delimitate forests as a set of land parcels, which has or could have tree ve disturbation. (Davis). CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION These  devil terms are often confused with one an some other, but they refer to  devil slightly different c one timepts. Preservation of  eitherthing is basically keeping it in   such manner that it  potbellynot or should not be touched or used.For  compositors case, if a forest is being preserved it means that it is to be kept  unswayed and nothing is to be extracted from it. It is to be left to its own accord. On the other    hand, conservation implies more towards a sustained use, or use in a sustainable fashion. As in the example given above, if a forest is declared as  keep abreastd, it means that resources may be extracted in a systematic and accounted way, so as not to compromise the forests ability to replenish itself in terms of resources, and so that it may continue its intangible functions properly.SUSTAINABILITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT The term refers to the existence and maintenance of a system, on its own accord,  everywhere a period of time, or that a system is able to stand and function by itself for a certain duration. This term then leads on to sustainable development, which the latest of concepts in development of a nation and its entities. Sustainable development means the development targeted at  qualification resources  functional both useful yet sustained, so as no to compromise it for future generations. FOREST MANAGEMENTThe society of the Statesn Foresters (1958) defined fores   t management as the application of business methods and technical forestry principles to the  public presentation of forestry property.  (American). Generally put, forest management is the maintenance of forests in such a way that it is protected and  holdd at the same time. In other words it the system by which we  buzz off sure that we extract resources from the forest in a sustained way (sustainable yields) and so that the forest does not lose its credibility. Forests  come along in various types and properties.They range from  tropic  semi-evergreen rain forests along the equator of the earth, to temperate and boreal forests in northern America and Russia. The worlds tropical forests, which circle the globe, are interestingly diverse. Ranging from the steamy jungles of the rain forests to the  juiceless forests and savannas, they provide habitat for  billions of species of plants and animals.  at a time covering some 15. 3  cardinal  solid ground (6. 2 billion ha), these tropica   l forests have been reduced  by means of  baseball swing and clearing by 210 million acres (85 million ha)  betwixt 1985 and 1990. (Louise). This is in fact the story in most parts of the world.Bangladesh for instance is losing its  instinctive forestland at an  dread rate of 3. 3% a year, which is the  ordinal highest rate in the world after Jamaica and Haiti. (Miller, 641). Although plantations have gone up in percentage during the last few  days, especially strip plantations, which are a recent phenomenon in Bangladesh, especially in Dhaka,  indwelling forests are still on the decrease. This can be  listenn in the table below, as of the year 2000, which also includes comparisons to Asia and the world as a whole. Yet credibly the saddest story to be told is that of the worlds tropical forests.Although tropical rainforests cover less than six percent of the earths land surface, they are extraordinarily endowed with millions of animal species and represent s withalty-five million ye   ars of evolutionary stability. Covering a land area approximately the  surface of the United States, tropical forests are being  rapidly degraded, the equivalent of the unite areas of Ohio and Indiana each year. According to some experts, almost half the worlds tropical forests have already been wiped of the face of the earth for good. If we  visit at the table given below, we can get an estimate of what the  office really is at present.Data is set as of research till the year 2000. Forest Area and Change Bangladesh Asia (excl. Middle East) World   wide-cut forest area, 2000 (000 ha) 1334 504180 3869455  Natural forest area, 2000 (000 ha) 709 375824 3682722  Plantations area, 2000 (000 ha) 625 110953 186733  Total dry land area, 1950-1981 (000 ha) a 0 1078121 5059984  Change in forest area   Total, 1990-2000 14 % -1 % -2 %   Natural, 1990-2000 -7 % -1 % -4 %   Plantations, 1990-2000 4 % 5 %  3 %  Original forest b as a percent of     union land area c 100 % X 48 %  Forest area in 20   00 as a percent of   total land area c 9 % 20 % 29 %         FIG table has been  accommodaten from an article titled Forest preservation from the Earth Trends website. Ecosystem Areas by Type  Total land area  14400 2494475 13328979   percent of total land area covered by    Forests  12 % 17 % 24 %   Shrublands, savanna, and grasslands 3 % 37 % 37 %      mosaic 73 % 34 % 20 %   Urban and built-up areas  0. 2 % 0. 2 % 0. 2 %   Sparse or barren vegetation snow and ice  0 % 10 % 16 %   Wetlands and water bodies 11 % 2 % 3 %  The total global forest cover has decreased by approximately 4% in just 10 years, and Bangladesh has lost more than 7% of its natural forest resources.This is alarming in more than just environmental perspectives. Yet, when we look into conservation possibilities, all sides, sectors, direct and indirect reasons need to be assessed before coming to any kind of decision. Since this paper is  close to the conservation needs of forests, all such sectors and sides have    been touched in the following sections. Before the dawn of agriculture approximately 10,000 years ago, forests and  receptive woodland covered about 15. 3 billion acres (6. 2 billion ha) of the globe. Over the centuries, however, about  triplet of these natural forests have been destroyed. According to a 1982 study by FAO, about 27. 9 million acres (11. million ha) of tropical forests are cut each year-an area about the size of the States of Ohio or Virginia. Between 1985 and 1990, an estimated 210 million acres (85 million ha) of tropical forests were cut or cleared. In India, Malaysia, and the Philippines, the  exceed commercial forests are gone, and  miscue is increasing in South America. (J. Louise).  some(prenominal) factors are  accountable for deforestation clearing for agriculture, fuel wood bare-assed, and harvesting of wood products. By far the most important of these is clearing for agriculture. In the Tropics, the  passee practice of shifting, sometimes called slash-and-   burn, agriculture has been used for centuries.In this primitive system,  local anesthetic   hatful cut a  minor patch of forest to make way for subsistence farming. After a few years, soil fertility declines and people move on, usually to cut another(prenominal) patch of trees and begin another garden. In the abandoned plot, the degraded soil at  premiere supports  simply weeds and shrubby trees. Later, soil fertility and trees return, but that may take decades. As population pressure increases, the fallow (rest) period between cycles of  cultivation is shortened, agricultural yields decrease, and the forest region is further degraded to small trees, brush, or eroded savanna. Conversion to sedentary agriculture is an even greater threat to tropical forests.Vast areas that once supported tropical forests are now permanently occupied by subsistence farmers and ranchers and by commercial farmers who produce sugar, cocoa,  ornament oil, and other products. In many tropical countries thi   ther is a  life-sustaining shortage of firewood. For millions of rural poor, survival depends on  materialiseing enough wood to cook the evening meal. Every year more of the forest is destroyed, and the  blank space from home to the forest increases. Not only do people  come by having to spend much of their time in the search for wood, but so does the land. Damage is greatest in dry tropical forests where firewood cutting converts forests to savannas and grasslands.The global demand for tropical hardwoods, an $8-billion-a-year industry, also contributes to forest loss.  equatorial forests are usually selectively logged rather than clear-cut. Selective logging  distributes the forest cover intact but usually reduces its commercial value because the biggest and best trees are removed. Selective logging also damages remaining trees and soil, increases the likelihood of fire, and degrades the habitat for wildlife species that  have a bun in the oven large, old trees-the ones usually cut   . In addition, logging roads open up the forests to shifting cultivation and permanent settlement. In the past, logging was done primarily by primitive means-trees were cut with axes and logs were moved with animals such as oxen.Today the use of modern machinerychain saws, tractors, and trucks -makes logging easier, faster, and potentially more destructive. In Bangladesh, it is more or less the same picture. Being a developing country which is yet striving to stand on its own feet, it is still extracting its only, and few available resources such as forests for the sake of rapid economic growth. Further more, the lack of land space is forcing settlers to encroach upon forest land, in order to use it for agriculture and fisheries purposes. The poor are  use forests as means for survival, and  in that respect is little the administration (local governments and forest department) can do to stop illegal encroachment in forests.Yet even so, as I have stated in my hypothesis, it is  doabl   e for a country like Bangladesh to conserve forests and  get up poverty at the same time, and the following sections will consist of exactly how this may be achieved. In his article Conservation  dodging Rationale and a Framework, Dr. Mizanur Rahman caravansary says, there is a difference in perspective regarding what to conserve and how to conserve.  bingle group, often dubbed as radical greens,  present that the global environmental problems have already reached a crisis proportion and require a fire fighting strategy. On the other side of the fence, there are free-market environmentalists who argue that environmental laws and regulations impose unfair burdens on the economy and on individuals.  A balance between the two is what Dr.M Khan thinks is required, and he goes on to say that the protection of the environment is an essential part of development and that this is globally recognized. In this light, when we look at the conservation efforts being made to conserve the forests    of Bangladesh, it is almost immediately clear that most of the above stated conditions are not being applied. Problems with definitions of protected areas still remain, and hence loop holes give people the chance to illegally encroach upon the land. So the question is now, what is there to be done? What steps should Bangladesh authorities take to prevent such anomalies and protect the forests we have? A simple solution is given by Dr.Abdur  pride Khan, a well  lastn economist and research  handler at Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies, when he was asked as to what Bangladesh can do. Dr hook says Indeed Bangladesh does have the capability to both conserve and elevate poverty at the same time. To do that, the first and most  open step is to introduce participatory forestry. The stake holders have to be identify and given proper priority in terms of their needs and requirements. Second, we have far too less forest cover, only about 6-7% of the total land area r   ight now. This has to be doubled. This can be done by introducing social forestry, homestead forestry and road side forestry.Once these two steps have been undertaken, we can then head on towards poverty elevation, because both these steps will not only help the nation as a whole, but also see to the needs of the local people in and around forests. Other wise, conservation may face an early death, and we may as well lose our forests.  The points upheld by Dr. Abdur Rob are to great degrees true. Indeed, the only way to ensure the survival of a resource and the people associated with it is to introduce those people into its management and care. Below I have stated some of the ways to o this and also some other steps towards conserving forests. PARTICIPATORY FORESTRY (Social Forestry) To involve the local people, and to pick out the stake holders, the initial thing that needs to be done is to get to know the social aspects of the people involved.This process is called Focus Group Disc   ussions  basically authority people have to go to the locality and get to know the social life styles of the local people. This is done by conducting such discussions with selected people from the locality. A questionnaire is made which involves everything ranging from average yearly income to what festivals they have and their matrimonial practices. Once this can be done, stake holders can be identified and selected out. They are then involved in to the management regimes, including decision making privileges to resource extraction etc. In depth discussions are then held with the selected people and local leaders to figure out how benefits are to be shared.  both(prenominal) tangible and intangible benefits from the forest are then held up to the people.participatory forestry can be seen in practice in the strip plantations in and around Dhaka along side roads and rail lines. These are basically community based resource management schemes, from which involved people receive benefit   s in future for their present services, hence encouraging them to conserve the site. ANCIENT FORESTRY PRACTICES In ancient Persia (now Iran), forest protection and nature conservation laws were in effect as early as 1,700 B. C. Two  m years ago the Chinese practiced what they called four sides forestry-trees were planted on house side, village side, road side, and water side. More than 1,000 years ago,  Javan maharajahs brought in teak and began to cultivate it. In the African Tropics, agro forestry (growing of food crops n association with trees) has been practiced for hundreds of years. Relatively little is known about tropical forestry before the mid 1800s in most places. At that time, the European  colonial empires notably the Dutch, English, and Spanish-brought modern forest management practices to Indonesia, India, Africa, and the Caribbean. Centers for forestry and forestry research were established, and more  protective(predicate) records were kept. (J. Louise). SUSTAINABLE    FORESTRY Modern forestry has its basis in 18th-century Germany. Like the Chinese and the Mayan forest practices, German forestry is essentially agricultural. Trees are managed as a crop. Two concepts are important renewability and sustainability.Renewability means that trees can be replanted and seeded and harvested over and over again on the same tract of land in what are known as crop rotations.  Sustainability means that forest harvest can be sustained over the long term. How far into the future were foresters  evaluate to plan? As long as there were vast acres of virgin (original) forests remaining, this question was somewhat academic. Today, however, sustainability is a vital issue in forestry. Most of the worlds virgin forests are gone, and people must rely more and more on second- growth or managed forests. Perhaps we now face, as never before, the limits to long-term productivity. In the German forest model, forestry is viewed as a continual process of harvest and regenerati   on.Harvest of wood products is a goal, but a foresters principal tasks are to assure long-term productivity. That is achieved by cutting the older, mature, and slow-growing timber to make way for a new crop of young,  invasive trees. HARVEST REGENRATION METHOD Three examples of timber harvest-regeneration methods (silvicultural systems) illustrate how foresters manage stands to produce timber on a sustained basis. SELECTION Individual trees or small groups of trees are harvested as they become mature. Numerous small openings in the forest are created in which saplings or new seedlings can grow. The resulting forest has a continuous forest canopy and trees of all ages.Such systems  favor slow-growing species that are shade tolerant. CLEAR CUTTING In clear cutting, an  good stand of trees is removed in one operation. From the foresters point of view, clear cutting is the easiest way to manage a forest-and the most economical. Regeneration may come from sprouts on stumps, from seedling   s that survive the logging operation, or from seeds that germinate after the harvest. If natural regeneration is delayed longer than desired, the area is planted or seeded.  set free cutting systems are often used to manage fast-growing species that require a lot of light. Resulting stands are even aged because all the trees in an area are cut-and regenerated-at the same time.Clear cutting has become  debatable in recent years because it has the potential to damage watersheds and because it tends to eliminate species of wildlife  interdependent on old growth trees. If clear cuts are kept small and the cutting interval is long enough, however, biological diversity may not be impaired. SHELTERWOOD In Shelterwood systems, the forest canopy is removed over a period of years, usually in two cuttings. After the first harvest, natural regeneration begins in the understory. By the time the second harvest is made, enough young trees have grown to assure adequate regeneration. Shelterwood sys   tems favor species that are intermediate in tolerance to shade. Such systems are difficult to use successfully and are the least used of the three silvicultural methods described. ANALYSIS OF FINDINGSIt seems that the  plain conclusion would be, as Dr. Rob said, that social forestry is the best option available to us at present. This will not only enable Bangladesh to conserve its few remaining forests, but also use those forests efficiently as a tool to poverty elevation. In fact this is not the first time research on Bangladesh forests has led to such conclusions. Many experts have done similar such research and have come to find this sort of forestry as efficient means of conservation. pic . Fig Plantation in Shatchori reserved forest. Bangladesh yet faces many hard steps to the stage we call developed. Even now, it faces harden blockades when the question of conservation arises.Poverty, high population, land shortage, illegal encroachment, political disfucntionings and sheer ign   orance of duty are just some of the barricades that hold us back from preserving the few resources we have left in this once lushly rich country. It not as though we are not conserving. Indeed, plantations have come up across the country in what seems hopeful ways. It seems that there is yet hope for us and our forests. Shatchari, Modhupur, Lawachara, Medakochapia are some bright  names in our success books concerning plantation forestry. Yet I raise the question to the jury, is this what we really want for us? Do we really want to see some time in the future that the country is devoid of its natural forests and has only plantations left?Plantations, Strip plantations, mono-cultures, botanical gardens are very good in terms of forest cover, but if we lose all our natural forests, what would happen to all the hundreds of species of animals and birds that we have? We would lose them forever. Will it be possible for us to conserve them to? The case stands for the rest of the world as w   ell. Tropical forests are being deforested at a football field size a day. Very soon, perhaps sooner than we think, we will lose what we have left to the greed of a few ignorant people. Will it not shame us to think that we human beings will be responsible of wiping out all other species just for the sake of our comfort? Is this not a question of ethics?It remains to be seen as to how Bangladesh, less to say the rest of the world acts to save its forests, yet perhaps it is not wise to just sit and wait for some miracle to happen. It is time we put on our thinking caps and stepped out into the field, and tried our best to see to that we leave the few natural pristine forests remaining at peace with themselves.  acidulate cited  Mastrantonio J. Louise. CONSERVATION OF FORESTS. Online journal. nd. 18th December 2006. http//www. fs. fed. us/global/lzone/student/tropical. htm  Forests of the World. Forestry Overview. Online article. nd. nineteenth December 2006. http//www. worldwildlife.    org/forests/  Davis, L.S 1966. Forest Management. 1st edition. pp 790.  Earth Trends. Forest Conservation. Online Journal. nd. 19th December 2006. http//earthtrends. wri. org/text/biodiversity-protected/country-profiles. html Forest Conservation.  enterprise for the Americas in Action. Online article. nd. 19th December 2006. http//www. earthvoice. org/animal. habitat/forest. conservation. htm  Khan, Mizanur Rahman. Conservation Strategy Rationale and a Framework. Conservation and Sustainable Development.  Interview  Dr. Abdur Rob Khan. Research Director at Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies, Dhaka, Bangladesh. twentieth December 2006.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment