Responsibility of Ethics Essay

Ethical standing among community members and business persons is held in blue regard. The matter of trust needs to be had at all times so that people know that their information is safe. When ethical exposes arise, somewhere, somehow in that location has to be someone who is able and willing to stand up and calculate the unethical issue. All professionals are encumber by ethics and the tariff to report wrong doing.In this case, the leave behinds lawyer is charging the widow 12-14% more than his average percentage with respects to his other clients. Normal terrene ethics suggest that non only is he acting in bad ethics but obviously is taking advantage of this widow. Charlie, regular if not mandated by law or administrative rule, should inform the widow. This would be the right and respectful thing to do but is Charlie mandated by whatsoever code of ethics to act on this information and inform her is the real question.Charlie, even though he is not the person creating the ethical situation, is bound by ethical codes to inform this widow at the very least but more appropriately the governing agency, of the actions of her attorney. As stated in the AICPA enactment of Professional Conduct for CPAs members should act with integrity, maneuver by the precept that when members fulfill their responsibility to the public, clients and employers interests are best served. (ET role 53 bind IIThe Public Interest, ET arm 52 Article IResponsibilities, ET Section 54 Article IIIIntegrity & ET Section 56 Article VDue Care of the AICPA).The biggest ethical issue is honesty, integrity and the personal gain issues. The attorney stands to gain a substantive amount of money, well more than what he should for his services. The code of ethics for attorneys alone is violated is drastic ways. Some states have statutes on how an attorney trusts their client and some rely of good ethical style but this aside, attorneys are to charge only what is fair and consistent with how they charge everyone else.This attorney is violating a huge public interest and the widow nooky file a complaint and the attorney stands to lose his liscense to practice law. Charlie stick out also intervene and simply make a phone clapperclaw to the governing agency as this particular information that he knows, is not bound by the confidentiality laws as this information was derived not by the widows linguistic communication but by the admittance of the attorney in which there is no confidentiality as there is no client issue due to the point that Charlie is not asking for advice and the lawyer is not giving it.Works CitedAICPA Code of Professional Conduct. 2006-2008. http//www.aicpa.org/About/code/sec50.htmNew Jersey Judiciary. Office of attorney Ethics. 2001 http//www.judiciary.state.nj.us/oae/OAEEthicsPamphlet.pdf